server cloud Piergiorgio Venuti

Server Cloud

server cloud

A cloud server or VPS (Virtual Private Server) is a fully-fledged server with its own operating system and well-defined hardware features only that unlike a classic server it shares physical resources with other virtual machines in this way more VPS can be run simultaneously on the same server (hypervisor).

This virtualization technique allows significant cost savings and an optimization of hardware resources as it is possible to run multiple operating systems on the same hardware.

 

Server Cloud – Pros cons

Pros:

 

   ♦ Migration: It is possible to “move” (migrate) a VPS from one server (hypervisor) to another (even without interruption of service).

Example: You have created a VPS on a hypervisor in Italy and you want to move it to a server in America. With a VPS, as long as the Cloud Provider has another Datacenter in America, this can be done quickly.

   ♦ Scalability: It is the possibility of increasing or decreasing the hardware resources (CPU, RAM, Disk, etc) without rebuilding the VPS and in some cases without restarting it in full transparency to users who use the services provided.
Example: A VPS of 2 cores, 1 GB of RAM and 20 GB of disk has been created but after a few months we realize that the RAM memory is insufficient for the services provided and it is necessary to increase it. With a VPS it is very easy to solve this problem, just increase the RAM from the configuration panel and the new configuration will be applied (in the case of linux systems without the need to reboot).

   ♦ Autoscaling: It is the possibility to increase or decrease the resources (scaling) automatically according to well defined hardware policies. This technique is extremely valid in cases of load peaks.
Example: A VPS has been created with 2 cores, 1 GB of RAM and 20 GB but in some periods of the year due to the high user access these resources are not sufficient, then in this case it is possible to configure these policies:

a) If the CPU is at 90% for more than 1h then the CPU of a core increases every 30min for a maximum of 6 cores and then if the CPU is less than 10% for more than 1h decrease the CPU of a core every 30 min up to a minimum of 2 cores.

b) If the RAM is 99% for more than 1h then increase the RAM of 1Gb every 30min for a maximum of 32Gb and then if the RAM is less than 50% for more than 1h decrease the RAM of a core every 30 min until at a minimum of 1Gb.

   ♦ Low cost: by comparing the cost of a VPS to that of a fiscal server like hardware resources, the cost of a VPS is much lower, especially considering that some cost items are already included in the VPS fee. :
   a) Energy consumption;  

   b) Internet band;

   c) Cost of public IP addresses;

   d) Costs related to housing (cooling, surveillance, etc); 

   e) Firewall;

   f) Technical assistance.

Cons:

   ♦ Shared resources: Depending on the configurations and characteristics of the Cloud Provider, some hardware resources, such as the CPU, could be shared so performance may be lower than a physical server. This condition is not always true as it is possible to request a 100% allocation on all hardware resources to your Cloud Provider.

Server Cloud – Limits:

  1. ♦ OS Virtualization: Not all operating systems and platforms can be virtualized (Eg AS400, Apple OS).
  2. ♦ Band: Although this is not an inherent problem of virtualization itself there could be latency differences in the Internet connection between a physical server in the company and a VPS if users are predominantly within the company and if the company has not an adequate Internet line.
    Example: A physical server in the customer’s DMZ is accessed by its LAN users via a 10Gb line, if the server is virtualized and becomes a VPS at a Cloud provider, access to it is transmitted via the client’s Internet line which may be more slow.

Server Cloud – False myths:

  1. ♦ A VPS does not have the same performance as a physical server: By allocating 100% of the physical resources and correctly dimensioning a VPS the latter has nothing to envy to a physical server from a performance point of view.
  2. ♦ A VPS is less secure than a physical server: A VPS can have the same degree of security as a physical server because it is possible to adopt the same security measures (Firewall, Antivirus, Hardening, VPN) applicable to a Fiscal server.

Check out the Cloud Server

[btnsx id=”2931″]

Useful links:

IaaS | Cloud | Infrastructure as a Service

Let’s Encrypt Free Certificates for all Webhosting users

Alternative to the NAS

CloudFlare free Plesk extension for Webhosting users

Demo Cloud Servers

Free Microsoft Windows licenses

New templates for VPS

VPS

Docs

How to have your computer network under control

VPS Metered – Cloud location

ownCloud

Home

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS darkreading

RSS Full Disclosure

  • SEC Consult SA-20240513-0 :: Tolerating Self-Signed Certificates in SAP® Cloud Connector May 14, 2024
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on May 14SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20240513-0 > ======================================================================= title: Tolerating Self-Signed Certificates product: SAP® Cloud Connector vulnerable version: 2.15.0 - 2.16.1 (Portable and Installer) fixed version: 2.16.2 (Portable and Installer) CVE number: CVE-2024-25642 impact: high homepage:...
  • TROJANSPY.WIN64.EMOTET.A / Arbitrary Code Execution May 14, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on May 14Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/f917c77f60c3c1ac6dbbadbf366ddd30.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: TrojanSpy.Win64.EMOTET.A Vulnerability: Arbitrary Code Execution Description: The malware looks for and executes a x64-bit "CRYPTBASE.dll" PE file in its current directory. Therefore, we can hijack the DLL and execute […]
  • BACKDOOR.WIN32.ASYNCRAT / Arbitrary Code Execution May 14, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on May 14Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/2337b9a12ecf50b94fc95e6ac34b3ecc.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.AsyncRat Vulnerability: Arbitrary Code Execution Description: The malware looks for and executes a x32-bit "CRYPTSP.dll" PE file in its current directory. Therefore, we can hijack the DLL and execute […]
  • Re: Panel.SmokeLoader / Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) May 14, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on May 14Updated and fixed a payload typo and added additional info regarding the stored persistent XSS see attached. Thanks, Malvuln Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/4b5fc3a2489985f314b81d35eac3560f_B.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Panel.SmokeLoader Vulnerability: Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) - Persistent XSS […]
  • Panel.SmokeLoader / Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) May 14, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on May 14Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/4b5fc3a2489985f314b81d35eac3560f_B.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Panel.SmokeLoader Vulnerability: Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Family: SmokeLoader Type: Web Panel MD5: 4b5fc3a2489985f314b81d35eac3560f (control.php) SHA256: 8d02238577081be74b9ebc1effcfbf3452ffdb51f130398b5ab875b9bfe17743 Vuln...
  • Panel.SmokeLoader C2 / Cross Site Scripting (XSS) May 14, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on May 14Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/4b5fc3a2489985f314b81d35eac3560f.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Panel.SmokeLoader Vulnerability: Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Family: SmokeLoader Type: Web Panel MD5: 4b5fc3a2489985f314b81d35eac3560f (control.php) SHA256: 8d02238577081be74b9ebc1effcfbf3452ffdb51f130398b5ab875b9bfe17743 Vuln ID:...
  • Panel.Amadey.d.c C2 / Cross Site Scripting (XSS) May 14, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on May 14Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/50467c891bf7de34d2d65fa93ab8b558.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Panel Amadey.d.c Vulnerability: Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Family: Amadey Type: Web Panel MD5: 50467c891bf7de34d2d65fa93ab8b558 (Login.php) SHA256: 65623eead2bcba66817861246e842386d712c38c5c5558e50eb49cffa2a1035d Vuln ID:...
  • Re: RansomLord v3 / Anti-Ransomware Exploit Tool Released May 14, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on May 14Updated, fixed typo SHA256 : 810229C7E62D5EDDD3DA9FFA19D04A31D71F9C36D05B6A614FEF496E88656FF5
  • RansomLord v3 / Anti-Ransomware Exploit Tool Released May 14, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on May 14Proof-of-concept tool that automates the creation of PE files, used to exploit Ransomware pre-encryption. Updated v3: https://github.com/malvuln/RansomLord/releases/tag/v3 Lang: C SHA256: 83f56d14671b912a9a68da2cd37607cac3e5b31560a6e30380e3c6bd093560f5 Video PoC (old v2): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ho0bpeJWqI RansomLord generated PE files are saved to disk in the x32 or x64 directories where the program is run from. Goal is to exploit...
  • APPLE-SA-05-13-2024-8 tvOS 17.5 May 14, 2024
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on May 14APPLE-SA-05-13-2024-8 tvOS 17.5 tvOS 17.5 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/HT214102. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/HT201222 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. AppleAVD Available for: Apple TV HD and Apple TV 4K (all […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}